<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for The Opening Brief</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?feed=comments-rss2" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress</link>
	<description>A Blog devoted to appellate law and issues</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:12:02 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on No Job Protection for Medical Marijuana Users by Law Guy</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=92#comment-1411</link>
		<dc:creator>Law Guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 02:12:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=92#comment-1411</guid>
		<description>Until it becomes federal law as well there wil always be conflicts. The employer is just protecting themseleves for legal issues that may arise later. Im sure they dont care themselves!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Until it becomes federal law as well there wil always be conflicts. The employer is just protecting themseleves for legal issues that may arise later. Im sure they dont care themselves!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failure to secure a ruling on objections constitutes waiver by Preserving Evidentiary Objections for Appeal from a Summary Judgment &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=65#comment-1313</link>
		<dc:creator>Preserving Evidentiary Objections for Appeal from a Summary Judgment &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 17:31:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=65#comment-1313</guid>
		<description>[...] Caso at the Opening Brief pointed out this likelihood last October, when he covered a series of decisions creating a conflict on this issue in the courts of appeal.  CalBizLit posted on Friday that trial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caso at the Opening Brief pointed out this likelihood last October, when he covered a series of decisions creating a conflict on this issue in the courts of appeal.  CalBizLit posted on Friday that trial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Failure to secure a ruling on objections constitutes waiver by Greg May</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=65#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Feb 2008 02:00:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=65#comment-1276</guid>
		<description>You called that one!  According to &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.calbizlit.com/cal_biz_lit/2008/02/reid-v-google-e.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;CalBizLit &lt;/a&gt;, the Supremes granted review in &lt;em&gt;Reid&lt;/em&gt; today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You called that one!  According to <a href="http://www.calbizlit.com/cal_biz_lit/2008/02/reid-v-google-e.html" rel="nofollow">CalBizLit </a>, the Supremes granted review in <em>Reid</em> today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on City&#8217;s pre-election challenge to initiative not a SLAPP by ken Stansbury</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=64#comment-1091</link>
		<dc:creator>ken Stansbury</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:58:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=64#comment-1091</guid>
		<description>Anyone want to file an amicus? The California State Supreme Court hasgiven itself an extention on the Petition for Review. The Court meets again on February 13 and the deadline for their reply to petition is February 19.
Jump in, the water is warm but the freedom of speach has been flash frozen.
Defend Direct Democracy, because if the 4th District ruling stands you can kiss the local citizen intiative goodbye.

Thanks for covering this,
Ken Stansbury</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Anyone want to file an amicus? The California State Supreme Court hasgiven itself an extention on the Petition for Review. The Court meets again on February 13 and the deadline for their reply to petition is February 19.<br />
Jump in, the water is warm but the freedom of speach has been flash frozen.<br />
Defend Direct Democracy, because if the 4th District ruling stands you can kiss the local citizen intiative goodbye.</p>
<p>Thanks for covering this,<br />
Ken Stansbury</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Year&#8217;s Resolution for Appellate Counsel? by Greg May</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=86#comment-909</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg May</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 19:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=86#comment-909</guid>
		<description>Thanks, for the inspiration, Tom, to resolve to do the same.  Writing&#039;s the whole reason I got into this area.

Mister Thorne, the article is more than 10 years old, from the May 1997 edition of the ABA Journal, and I did not see it available at their website.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks, for the inspiration, Tom, to resolve to do the same.  Writing&#8217;s the whole reason I got into this area.</p>
<p>Mister Thorne, the article is more than 10 years old, from the May 1997 edition of the ABA Journal, and I did not see it available at their website.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on New Year&#8217;s Resolution for Appellate Counsel? by Mister Thorne</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=86#comment-907</link>
		<dc:creator>Mister Thorne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jan 2008 18:06:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=86#comment-907</guid>
		<description>Which edition of the ABA Journal? Do you have a link to it? 

Thanks.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Which edition of the ABA Journal? Do you have a link to it? </p>
<p>Thanks.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Burned by the (lack of a) record by The Record is Everything &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=84#comment-745</link>
		<dc:creator>The Record is Everything &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:16:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=84#comment-745</guid>
		<description>[...] Caso has this post at The Opening Brief regarding a Ninth Circuit case last week in which Judge Kleinfeld laments his inability to follow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caso has this post at The Opening Brief regarding a Ninth Circuit case last week in which Judge Kleinfeld laments his inability to follow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Burned by the (lack of a) record by Burned by the (lack of a) record &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=84#comment-744</link>
		<dc:creator>Burned by the (lack of a) record &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 08:05:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=84#comment-744</guid>
		<description>[...] Caso has this post at The Opening Brief regarding a Ninth Circuit case last week in which Judge Kleinfeld laments his inability to follow [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Caso has this post at The Opening Brief regarding a Ninth Circuit case last week in which Judge Kleinfeld laments his inability to follow [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Police must return medical marijuana by The Volokh Conspiracy</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=79#comment-708</link>
		<dc:creator>The Volokh Conspiracy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 07:12:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=79#comment-708</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;&quot;Police Must Return Medical Marijuana&quot;:...&lt;/strong&gt;

Tom Caso (The Opening Brief) reports, pointing to a California Court of Appeal decision from last week, ...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>&#8220;Police Must Return Medical Marijuana&#8221;:&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>Tom Caso (The Opening Brief) reports, pointing to a California Court of Appeal decision from last week, &#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Waiver of Jurisdictional Defects? by Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies is a Waivable Defense &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</title>
		<link>http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=77#comment-679</link>
		<dc:creator>Failure to Exhaust Administrative Remedies is a Waivable Defense &#124; The California Blog of Appeal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Nov 2007 19:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=77#comment-679</guid>
		<description>[...] tend to agree with Tom Caso at The Opening Brief that this case may be headed for the Supreme Court.  The importance of this issue to public [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tend to agree with Tom Caso at The Opening Brief that this case may be headed for the Supreme Court.  The importance of this issue to public [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
