Comments for The Opening Brief http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress A Blog devoted to constitutional interpretation and appellate decisions Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:52:13 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 Comment on The Not-So-Free Market of the Internet: “California Only” Web Pages Can Be Required by The Opening Brief » Blog Archive » Comment on California Only Web Pages http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=22&cpage=1#comment-61 The Opening Brief » Blog Archive » Comment on California Only Web Pages Tue, 14 Aug 2007 16:52:13 +0000 http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=22#comment-61 [...] Tim Sandefur, an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation that litigates Dormant Commerce Clause Cases, had this to say about the People ex rel. Brown v. Puritec decision that I discussed here. [...] [...] Tim Sandefur, an attorney with Pacific Legal Foundation that litigates Dormant Commerce Clause Cases, had this to say about the People ex rel. Brown v. Puritec decision that I discussed here. [...]

]]> Comment on Ambush “Journalism” Protected by Anti-SLAPP Law by Greg May http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=21&cpage=1#comment-34 Greg May Tue, 07 Aug 2007 07:06:34 +0000 http://www.caso-law.com/blog/wordpress/?p=21#comment-34 Interesting that this case got no further than the first prong of rhe anti-SLAPP motion analysis. With the Court of Appeal sending the case back to the trial court to determine the second prong -- whether the plaintiff is likely to prevail on her claims -- it will be interesting to see how that comes out. The California Supreme Court has issued so many SLAPP opinions in the last two years, it's easy to see any given SLAPP case as a candidate for review. Interesting that this case got no further than the first prong of rhe anti-SLAPP motion analysis. With the Court of Appeal sending the case back to the trial court to determine the second prong — whether the plaintiff is likely to prevail on her claims — it will be interesting to see how that comes out.

The California Supreme Court has issued so many SLAPP opinions in the last two years, it’s easy to see any given SLAPP case as a candidate for review.

]]>